Legal Opinion

Kull v. Noble

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 26, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

The appellee, plaintiff below, brought this suit in the 'Sevier Circuit Court against the appellant, defendant below, to recover the sum of' $104, with interest, alleged t-o be the balance due on the price of a -certain piece of machinery known as a hog machine. The evidence shows that there is a difference between the make of the hog machine used in sawmills and the machine used in veneer mills; that they required a different arrangement. The appellant operated a veneer mill, and manufactured boxes, baskets, crates, caskets, etc., and it is contended that this machine was unfit for use in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Western Cabinet & Fixture Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. S. F. Bowser & Co. v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Warren v. FreemanTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Curtis & Co. Manufacturing v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. Crow v. Fones Bros. Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Modern Farm Service, Inc. v. Ben Pearson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. JerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Brierton v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. JerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API