Kull v. Noble
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.
The appellee, plaintiff below, brought this suit in the 'Sevier Circuit Court against the appellant, defendant below, to recover the sum of' $104, with interest, alleged t-o be the balance due on the price of a -certain piece of machinery known as a hog machine. The evidence shows that there is a difference between the make of the hog machine used in sawmills and the machine used in veneer mills; that they required a different arrangement. The appellant operated a veneer mill, and manufactured boxes, baskets, crates, caskets, etc., and it is contended that this machine was unfit for use in a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Western Cabinet & Fixture Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- S. F. Bowser & Co. v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Warren v. FreemanTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
- Curtis & Co. Manufacturing v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Crow v. Fones Bros. Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Modern Farm Service, Inc. v. Ben Pearson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. JerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Brierton v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. JerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930