Legal Opinion

Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist. v. Harper

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 2017No. 16 CA 11PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWise, J.

{¶ 1} Appellants Leatra Harper, Leslie Harper, and Steven Jansto appeal from the decision of the Court of Common Pleas, Guernsey County, denying their motion for summary judgment and granting a judgment on the pleadings in favor of Appellee Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District ("MWCD") in a declaratory judgment action. The relevant facts leading to this appeal are as follows.

{¶ 2} Appellee MWCD owns certain real estate in Guernsey County and Noble County, in the vicinity of the Senecaville Reservoir. Appellants are the owners of real property in Senecaville, Ohio.

{¶ 3} On or about…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mid-American Fire & Casualty Co. v. HeasleyOhio Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zamlen-Spotts v. Cleveland State Univ.Ohio Court of Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API