Legal Opinion
Redpath v. Auchincloss
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 17, 1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
This is an action by trustees under the will of Emma B. Auchincloss, late of Fairfield, in which they seek an interpretation of certain of its provisions. Mrs. Auchincloss died September 11, 1942, leaving the will and three codicils to it. She was survived by two daughters and a son and also by five children of one of the daughters and three children of the son. After her death one child, Janet, was born on June 13, 1945, to the son. The questions presented concern her right to a share in one of the trusts established in the will.
In the third clause of the will the testatrix gave the residue…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Steinway v. . SteinwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Leach v. . GodwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- State Bank & Trust Co. v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Rogers v. EnglishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- New Britain Trust Co. v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Second National Bank of New Haven v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1963
- Smuda v. SmudaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- In Re Trust Under the Last Will & Testament of ScheeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Britton v. KillianConnecticut Superior Court · 1968
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Hartford HospitalConnecticut Superior Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.