Legal Opinion
Smuda v. Smuda
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 8, 1966PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShannon, J.
The plaintiffs appealed to the Superior Court from a decree of the Probate Court for the district of Berlin dated October 27, 1964, in which that court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to reform the will of John Matodzinski. On July 27, 1960, John Matodzinski executed his last will and testament, which was admitted to probate on April 22, 1963. It contains four paragraphs, or items as they are designated in the will. The first paragraph provides for the payment of debts and funeral expenses. The second makes disposition of the rest of his estate to his wife, Rose Matodzinski. The third deals…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hatheway v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Warren v. First New Haven National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. BuchtenkirkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Redpath v. AuchinclossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
3Cited by9 opinions
- Connecticut Junior Republic v. Sharon HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- DiSesa v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Cornell v. CornellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. BrewsterConnecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Shulman v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.