State Bank & Trust Co. v. Nolan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
The defendant Vail claims that the absolute interest in what remains of the trust fund created by the will under consideration is vested in him, and that the remainder of the trust fund created by the will should be paid over to him. The two other groups in this triangular controversy insist upon a construction of the will which would result in the division of the fund among the grandchildren of the testator per stirpes, and arrive at this conclusion in several suggested lines of treatment of the subject. The argument of the defendant Vail in brief, is this: The will provides that in case any…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- White v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Allen v. AlmySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Lombard v. WitbeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Houghton v. BrantinghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Mahoney v. MahoneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Colonial Trust Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Ansonia National Bank v. KunkelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Manning v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Bryant v. HackettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Peyton v. WehrhaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.