Legal Opinion

Hardendorf v. Gafner

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1938No. 2073PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Justice.

The only question to be resolved in these proceedings in error is whether the district court of Big Horn County erred in a ruling made by it denying a new trial to W. T. Hardendorf on a motion filed by him in that court asking a new trial in an action entitled “Hattie B. Gafner and Drew Prugh, plaintiffs, vs. W. T. Har-dendorf, defendant.”

The facts pertinent to be now considered are in substance these: On March 4, 1937, the district court aforesaid rendered its judgment in said action in favor of the plaintiffs, this judgment being entered March 13th immediately following.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Arnold v. SkaggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Morrison v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Travis v. BacherigCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chandler v. DuganWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hamilton v. Swigart Coal MineWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  3. York v. North Central Gas Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Saunders v. SaundersWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Chandler v. DuganWyoming Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API