Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Travis

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1902No. 1362PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Third District Court, Salt Lake County.— Hon. O. W. Morse, Judge. Action by the plaintiff to recover a sum of money alleged to be due under the terms of a written contract. Erom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBaskin, J.

It is alleged in the complaint “that on the eleventh day of May, 1895, the defendant, W. E. Travis, had a contract with the United States Government, in due form of law, for the transporting of the United States mails on a mail route known as ‘No. 43349,’ from Belle Plaine, in the State of Iowa, to Irving, in said State of Iowa, which contract ran from the first day of July, 1895, to the thirtieth day of June, 1899, both dates inclusive, and had obtained permission from the United States to sublet the work under said contract; and on the said eleventh day of May, 1895, the said defendant, W.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Perego v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Jones v. HathawayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Wittenbrock v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Doll v. GoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Christofferson v. WeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Harman v. Yeager Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Farmers' & Stockgrowers' Bank v. Pahvant Valley Land Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Anderson v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API