Legal Opinion
In the Interest of A.M.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County
Decided May 20, 2013No. 1 OA 2013Published
1Opinion of the Court
TUNNELL, J.,
— Rule 1925(b) allows the trial court to enter an order directing the appellant to file of record in the trial court a concise statement of the errors complained of on appeal.
In this case, the appellant, A.M., has assigned 53 errors over seven pages, which certainly “hinder[s] the trial court in its preparation of legal analysis,” Caln Nether Company, L.P. v. Board of Supervisors of Thornbury Township, 840 A.2d 484, 490 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004), observing that Pa. R.A.P. 1925 is intended to aid trial judges in identifying and focusing upon those issues which the parties plan to raise on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Caln Nether Co., L.P. v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Stenger v. Lehigh Valley Hospital CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Kiak v. Crown Equipment Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Arnoldy v. Forklift L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In the Interest of M.B.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996