Legal Opinion

Colkett v. Hammond

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1918No. 14519PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from orders of the superior court for Pacific county, Edward H. Wright, J., entered January 6, 1917, approving the final account of a receiver and fixing his compensation and that of his attorneys.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The Raymond Trust Company having become insolvent, the Attorney General commenced an action in the name of the state, in the superior court for Pacific county,' which resulted in an order of that court being entered on October' 6, 1914, appointing A. W. Hammond receiver of the company to take charge of its property and wind up its affairs. Hammond promptly qualified by taking his oath of office and giving bond as required by the order of appoint-*417meat, and entered upon the discharge of his duties, continuing to administer the trust until' January 6, 1917. What occurred in the receivership…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. In re the Estate of DoaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Tompson v. Huron Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Gardella v. GardellaWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Mathieu v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Heater v. Boston Montana Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Steele v. Puget Sound Realty AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API