Legal Opinion

Heater v. Boston Montana Corp.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1926No. 5,855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

On March 22, 1923, an order was duly made in this action appointing Charles S. Muffly and I. H. Brand receivers of all of the properties of the defendant corporations. Under this order Mr. Muffly was given actual charge, management and control of all the properties of the several corporations located in this state, while Mr. Brand was given control of the business affairs of the corporations which centered in Boston, Massachusetts. Since the only matters raised on this ap peal relate to the accounts of Receiver Muffly, we eliminate Brand from further mention, and shall refer to the former…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burke v. Inter-State Savings & Loan Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Crawford v. PierseMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State ex rel. Heinze v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Henderson v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Sanger v. HuguenelMontana Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Brink v. McCrackenMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Arnold v. GenzbergerMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State Ex Rel. Rankin v. Farmers State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Mortimer v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Mortimer v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API