Legal Opinion
Miguel Angel Ocampo-Duran v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 2001No. 99-70981PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
At the request of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Memorandum disposition filed April 13, 2001, is redesig-nated as an authored Opinion by Judge Harry Pregerson.
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Miguel Angel Ocampo-Duran is a native and citizen of Mexico. He entered the United States without inspection in 1981/ In 1989, Ocampo-Duran adjusted his status to that of a legal permanent resident. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) initiated removal proceedings against Ocampo Duran on December 29, 1998 by serving him with a Notice to Appear. The Notice to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hector Tito Lujan-Armendariz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Mauro Roldan-Santoyo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Andres Flores-Miramontes,petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3Cited by41 opinions
- Catherine Torres v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Ravichandran Shivaraman v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Vasquez De Alcantar v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- ALYAZJIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.