Legal Opinion
O'Hara v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 23, 2010No. 6:08-cr-06121PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Patricia O’Hara (“O’Hara”) filed this action against National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”), seeking benefits pursuant to a National Union disability plan (the “Plan”) offered by her former employer, ITT Flygt Corporation (“ITT”), in which O’Hara was a participant, and for which National Union acted as the Plan administrator. O’Hara alleges that National Union’s decision to deny her disabili ty benefits under the Plan was unsupported by sufficient evidence, inconsistent with the terms of the Plan,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dennis Paese v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Robert W. Heidgerd v. Olin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Marianne Locher v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, Katten Muchin & ZavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- New York v. AMRO Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Barbara J. Lauder, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. First Unum Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and Coach Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- O'Hara v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Connor v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Haisley v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Kagan v. Unum ProvidentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011