Legal Opinion

New York v. AMRO Realty Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 25, 1991No. 1058, Docket 90-7940PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONBOY, District Judge:

This appeal concerns an insurance coverage dispute. The insured parties are the defendants/third-party plaintiffs, AMRO Realty Corp. (“AMRO”) and David and Harry Moskowitz (collectively, “the insureds”). They have been sued by The State of New York for violations of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERC-LA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., and for creating and maintaining a public nuisance, in connection with the discharge of hazardous waste from a site owned by AMRO and leased to a manufacturer, American Thermostat (“AT”). David and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Fitzpatrick v. American Honda Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Albert J. Schiff Associates, Inc. v. FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. QSP, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Pike v. GuarinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  3. Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Flanders Electric Motor Service, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Mentor Insurance Company v. BrannkasseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API