Price v. Price
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
TOM Glaze, Justice.
This court accepted jurisdiction of the appeal tice. presents a significant issue needing clarification or development of the law and also requires our interpretation of an act of the General Assembly. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2 (b)(5), (6) (2000). Specifically, we are asked whether Ark. Code Ann. § 16-65-121 (Supp. 1999) or Ark. R. Civ. P. 58 controls the facts in this case.
The facts are undisputed. Charles and Sue Price were married and had three sons. In 1977, they divorced and remarried; they later filed again for divorce in 1997. The second divorce proceeding is in issue…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. SypultSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Blaylock v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Shackelford v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bradford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- McGhee v. Arkansas State Board of Collection AgenciesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Pike Avenue Development Co. v. Pulaski CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Exigence, LLC v. BaylarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Community Bank of North Arkansas v. Tri-State PropaneCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.