Legal Opinion

Williams v. Hook

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1991No. 69979PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kauger, Justice:

The first impression issue presented is whether minor children or incapacitated dependent children may maintain a cause of action for the permanent loss of parental consortium1 when a parent is negligently injured by a third party. We find that they may.

ALLEGED FACTS

Cynthia A. Thomas (Thomas) first sought treatment from the defendant/appellee, Carl Hook, M.D. (Hook/doctor), on January 5, 1982, for relief of sinus drainage and infection. Hook performed a septoplasty on January 18, 1982, to clear Thomas’ sinus passages, and Thomas recovered from the surgery without incident.…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. De Angelis v. Lutheran Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mendillo v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Rishell v. Jane Phillips Episcopal Memorial Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Giuliani v. GuilerKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  5. High v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API