Legal Opinion

United States v. Parker

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 19, 2004No. NMCCA 200102191PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUSZAN, Judge:

The appellant was charged with unauthorized absence and missing movement by design in violation of Articles 86 and 87, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886 and 887. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, he pled guilty to unauthorized absence and, by exceptions and substitutions, to missing movement by neglect. A military judge, sitting as a special court-martial, convicted the appellant, in accordance with his pleas, of the unauthorized absence, but rejected his plea to missing movement by neglect. The convening authority then withdrew from the pretrial agreement and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. PenisterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. ChambersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. WatkinsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. SandersU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  2. United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  3. United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API