United States v. Parker

ERDMANN, Judge,

'with whom GIERKE, Chief Judge, joins (dissenting):

The majority opinion finds that the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals erred in reversing the military judge’s decision to reject Parker’s guilty plea to the charge of missing a movement by neglect. The majority goes on to find that Parker was not entitled to the benefit of his pretrial agreement because he specifically requested an unsuspended bad-conduct dis*467charge.1 Because I find that the lower court’s ruling is the law of the case and that Parker is entitled to the benefit of his bargain, I…