Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1907No. Nos. 14,891—(127)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Dibell, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

The respondents and defendants, owning certain lands in St. Louis county, signed a contract which recited that the defendants sold and conveyed to the plaintiff and appellant an undivided one-third interest therein for $10,000. The contract set forth, for the further consideration of one dollar, the agreement

That said sum of ten thousand dollars, with interest thereon at the rate of five per cent, per annum from this date till paid, is and shall be a charge and lien upon the whole of said land and premises in favor of said party [said plaintiff] for the term of five years from date hereof and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Avery v. PayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Eberts v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Brown v. CoddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Roberts v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Rayhol Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. McInteer v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Peterson v. DamoudeNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API