Legal Opinion

McCallum v. Driggs

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1895PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appel from the Circuit Court for Duval county. The facts iu the case are stated in the opinion of the-court.

1Opinion of the Court

Liddon, J. :

Appellee was the plaintiff in the court below, and! sued the appellants upon a promissory note. That portion of the declaration necessary to an understanding of the case was as follows: “1st. John S. Driggs, by Cooper & Cooper, his attorneys, sues Archibald McCallum and Jonathan C. Greeley, for that whereas-the defendant Archibald McCallum, on the 28th day *279of April, A. D. 1883, made Ms promissory note in writing and delivered the same to J ohn S. Sammis, and. thereby promised to pay to the order of John S. Sammis five hundred dollars, at the Florida Savings Bank... for value…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Webster v. BarnettSupreme Court of Florida · 1879
  2. Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Co. v. WarrinerSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  3. Gregory v. McNealySupreme Court of Florida · 1868
  4. Hunter v. Wilson, Stearly & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1885
  5. Reddick v. MicklerSupreme Court of Florida · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  2. Vaughan's Seed Store v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Padgett v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  4. Baumeister v. KuntzSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  5. Berger v. E. Berger & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1918

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API