Legal Opinion
Davis v. Richland County Council
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 12, 2007No. 26289PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waller
This is an appeal from the circuit court’s denial of a temporary injunction to stay enforcement of Act No. 207, 2005 Acts 1961. At issue is the constitutionality of the Act, which altered the method of appointment of the members of the Richland County Recreation Commission (Commission). We hold Act No. 207 constitutes unconstitutional special legislation.
*499FACTS
The (Commission) was created by Act No. 873, 1960 S.C. Acts 2010. Act No. 873 provided that the Commission was to be “composed of five resident electors of the recreational district to be appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Sloan v. SanfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Duncan v. County of YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Sloan Ex Rel. Resident, Taxpayer & Registered Elector v. Wilkins Ex Rel. S.C. House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- ATC South, Inc. v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Bodman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Carnival Corp. v. Historic Ansonborough Neighborhood Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Freemantle v. PrestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Found v. S.C. Dep't of Transp. & John V. WalshSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.