Ross v. Stockwell
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Monroe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
— Appellant sued appellee for the recovery of rent, the complaint showing that a certain portion of the amount claimed was due at the commencement of the action, and that the remainder thereof was not then due. There were proceedings in attachment, the complaint stating statutory grounds there-' *87for and being verified. The appellee answered specially as to the attachment, and filed three paragraphs of answer to the complaint for rent, numbered two, three, and four.
The appellant wholly failed to sustain the attachment, concerning which it is said in the brief for the appellant, “It is but fair…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCoy v. OldhamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hopkins v. RatliffIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Gowan v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Taylor v. LehmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sigsbee v. SwathwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Chicago & Erie Railway Co. v. CummingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Partridge v. DykinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Flanagan v. ReitemierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Woodbury Co. v. William Tackaberry Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.