State v. Lamm
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentMaughan, Justice
For the following reasons, I dissent. Following the presentation of the evidence the jury found the defendant, Albert Banard Lamm, guilty of theft by receiving in violation of Section 76-6-408. This statute provides in pertinent part:(1) A person commits theft if he . conceals, sells or withholds or aids in concealing, selling or withholding any such property from the owner, knowing the property to be stolen, [and] with the purpose to deprive the owner thereof.1
To convict an individual of concealing or aiding in the concealment of stolen property the prosecution must introduce evidence…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- State v. GosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. John Gordon McGlamoryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Gilbert George MartineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.