Legal Opinion
Koncelik v. Town of East Hampton
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 24, 1991No. CV 91-2869PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Lawrence J. and Doris W. Koncelik, (“plaintiffs”), husband and wife, bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Town of East Hampton (the “Town”), the Town Board of East Hampton (“Town Board”), the Town Planning Board of East Hampton (“Planning Board”), the East Hampton Town Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”), and unnamed John Doe conspirators Nos. 1 through 10 (collectively “defendants”). Plaintiffs allege violations of their constitutional rights to procedural and substantive due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Missere v. GrossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Soundview Associates v. Town of RiverheadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Ahmed v. Town of Oyster BayDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.