Legal Opinion

Matter of Baker

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 3, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter arises from a report of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) recommending that respondent, Dale W. Baker, be disbarred. The matter came before the DRB on a presentment filed by the District VIII Ethics Committee (DEC), as a result of a complaint filed by two former clients charging respondent with misappropriation of their funds. Respondent admits the misappropriations and recognizes that the normal consequence of such conduct is disbarment. See In re Wilson, 81 N.J. 451, 409 A.2d 1153 (1979). He claims, however, that his conduct was occasioned by a loss of will of sufficient…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. In Re JacobSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Matter of HeinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Matter of TusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Matter of GoldbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Matter of RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Matter of GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. Matter of RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API