Legal Opinion

United States v. Arnold

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided September 18, 1978No. CM 436802PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DRIBBEN, Judge:

Appellant, contrary to his plea, was convicted of robbery alleged as a violation of Article 122, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 922. His sentence, imposed by a general court-martial with members and approved by the convening authority, extended to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for three years, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances.

I

During his argument on findings the trial counsel stated:

*521. Now we come to the interesting defense raised by the accused. And I hope you noticed that the whole time the accused was testifying…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. DoctorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. NelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. KnickerbockerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. RyanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  5. United States v. RuggieroU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HerringU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. KilbourneU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. WarrenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API