Legal Opinion
Prasad v. Bullard
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 12, 2010No. 10-CA-291PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge.
12Pefendant/appelIant, Sid Bullard, appeals from a judgment ordering him to submit to arbitration. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
Plaintiff, Chandan Prasad (“Dr. Pra-sad”), entered into a contract with Bullard Capital, L.L.C., d/b/a Contract Services, to complete the construction of a house. A dispute regarding the construction con*38tract arose and, pursuant to the contract, Dr. Prasad submitted an arbitration demand to the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”). The arbitration demand asserted claims against Bullard Capital, L.L.C. (“Bullard Capital”),…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bridas S.A.P.I.C. v. Government of TurkmenistanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- ARW Exploration Corp. v. AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Port of South Louisiana v. Tri-Parish Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Courville v. Allied Professionals Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Seghers v. LaPlace Equipment Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Martin v. Spring Break '83 Production, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2011
- Bottom Line Equipment, L.L.C. v. BZ Equipment, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.