Legal Opinion

Yost v. Cassel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 14, 1953No. 35542PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an action in partition', wherein all of the parties, both plaintiff and defendant, are the children and heirs, or their grantees, of John C. Moore and/or his wife, Linnie Moore, both deceased, the original owners of the real estate involved which- they occupied as a homestead until their respective deaths. It was brought by the only two children' who were still mi•nors, by one of their sisters as next friend, who, with two of the adult brothers, joined, individually, as party plaintiff.- Upon motions of the guardian of their estates and the guardian of their persons,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Hoppe v. HoppeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Pennington v. Woodner-McgaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Hembree v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Rockwood v. Estate of St. JohnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Estate of WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API