Daniels v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Clinton; Searl, J. Case by George B. Daniels against the Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Company, the Grand Trunk Western Railway Company, and the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada. The defendant, the Grand Trunk Western Railway Company, filed a motion to quash the service of plaintiff’s declaration. An order denying the motion is reviewed by said defendant on writ of certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Suit was brought to recover damages for injuries which plaintiff claims that he received in a wreck in Canada on September 3, 1908, while a passenger on a train of the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada between the stations of Princeton and Gobles. At that time, as well as at the time of the commencement of this suit (November 3, 1909), plaintiff resided in Clinton county, Mich. He commenced the action by declaration in the Clinton circuit court. Service was made on the same day on the defendant Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Company, within said county, and proof of such service…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kermott v. AyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Cofrode v. GartnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Joy v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
- Davis v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Judd v. JuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Abick v. State Of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Chovan v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1963
- Reaume & Silloway, Inc. v. TetzlaffMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Alia v. Michigan Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- C. H. Little Co. v. L. P. Hazen Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.