Legal Opinion

American Fidelity Company v. Daniels

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 6, 1960No. 970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, C. J.

This is a chancery proceeding seeking a declaratory judgment. The chancellor has decreed that the plaintiff, the American Fidelity Company, is obligated to defend the defendants, Harold Daniels “and/or” Francis Morley under the terms of a specified insurance policy against any or all claims arising during the period that the policy was in force, within the terms of the policy and its endorsements, and to pay any claims against the said defendants within its terms. From this decretal order the plaintiff has taken its appeal to this Court. Only defendant Daniels has seen fit to contest the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. West River Power Co. v. BussinoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  2. Vinton v. Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. H. P. Hood & Sons v. HeinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  2. State of Maine v. Kristina I. LoweSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  3. In Re Estate of ValiquetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  4. Maryland Casualty Company v. HealdSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API