Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Company v. Heald

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 1, 1965No. 584PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.

This is a proceeding for a declaratory judgment in equity relating to the respective obligations of plaintiff, Maryland Causalty Company and defendants Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and Merchants Mutual Insurance Company, under certain automobile liability insurance policies issued by each company. On the findings of fact, the court declared the plaintiff and Merchants were primarily liable on specified policies (1) equally to defend one Stephen Heald in a suit brought against him in Federal court and (2) on a 2/3rds (plaintiff) - l,/3rd (Merchants) basis as to damages arising out of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Didlake v. Standard Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. State v. TeitleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
  3. American Fidelity Co. v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  4. Little v. LittleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  5. deNEERGAARD v. DillinghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burr v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cotton v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Frantz v. HCR Manor Care Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API