Legal Opinion

People v. Iannelli

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1986PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed.

Viewed in a light most favorable to the People, the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to establish defendant’s commission of aggravated disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.21).

Defendant’s claim that the statute violates the due process and establishment clauses of the United States Constitution (US Const 14th and 1st Amends) has not been preserved for our review. Defendant did not move pursuant to CPL 170.30 (1) (a) and CPL 170.35 (1) (c) within the time prescribed by CPL 170.30 (2) and CPL 255.20 (1) for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. BakolasNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. New York v. Luis J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. People v. DozierNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. KnowlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. People v. VolitonNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. McGrathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API