People v. Dozier
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*783We agree with the Appellate Division that the Legislature did not act unreasonably when it fixed the age of female consent at 17 years, as opposed to some other, presumably younger, age. However we express no opinion with respect to the other claims of unconstitutionality urged by the defendant and discussed in the Appellate Division opinion, namely, the contention that the statute unconstitutionally discriminates on the basis of sex or that it violates due process by eliminating the mens rea element. Those…
2Cited by17 opinions
- People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. LancasterNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. IannelliNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. PattersonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2000
- People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.