Hill v. Husky Briquetting, Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.
Plaintiffs are appealing from a directed verdict entered in favor of defendant prior to the impaneling of the jury. Certain facts relevant to decision of a controlling point of law were stipulated by the parties.
Plaintiffs commenced their action against the defendant charcoal briquette manufacturer and others 2 for the wrongful death of Anita L. Hill and injuries to Betty Jo Hill.
Helen R. Hill, mother of the deceased and injured children, was using defendant’s briquettes in a grill or brazier in their bedroom to provide heat for both herself and the children. Mrs. Hill’s husband left her…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Marietta v. Cliffs Ridge, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- McKinney v. YelavichMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Cheli v. Cudahy Bros. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Antcliff v. State Employees Credit UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Burch v. Amsterdam CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Smith v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Antcliff v. State Employees Credit UnionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Gutowski v. M & R Plastics & Coating, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.