Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Moll

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 14, 1988No. 00656PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered against appellant after his non-jury trial for criminal mischief.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for criminal mischief. For reasons appearing infra, we vacate the judgment of sentence and discharge appellant.

Appellant was arrested and charged with criminal mischief as a result of his admitted action in cutting a hole in a fifteen-inch storm drain pipe installed by the Borough of Wormleysburg, Cumberland County, on an easement adjacent to his property. While appellant admits to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. O'SEAROSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. RifeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. MosesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MattySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. State v. NewcombCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. PrzybylaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. In the Interest of R.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. In the Interest of M.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API