Commonwealth v. Moses
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This appeal is from judgment of sentence imposed after a bench trial at which appellant was found guilty of third degree robbery, theft, and simple assault.
Appellant raises two issues for our determination: whether the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to sustain a verdict of guilty of the charge of robbery and whether the trial court erred in not finding that the conduct of the appellant was no more than a de minimis infraction under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 312. 1 We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs submitted by counsel and find no merit in either of appellant’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LeatherburySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LutesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. MattySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. ToomerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. MollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Scurfield Coal, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.