Rupard v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Commissioner.
Daniel Rupard and Dieter Sierp were found guilty of possessing marijuana for the purpose of sale or disposal to another. The jury fixed the penalty of each of them at confinement in the penitentiary for four years and a fine of $3500. They seek reversal of the judgment of conviction, asserting that (1) evidence was improperly admitted against them; (2) the evidence for the Commonwealth was insufficient since an inference was based upon an inference ; (3) a directed verdict of acquittal should have been given since the evidence was entirely circumstantial and insufficient;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- The People v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Raoul Moody v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Haley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Houston v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- Young v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Franklin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
- Clay v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993
- Dawson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.