Montana-Dakota Power Co. v. Johnson
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
The plaintiff furnishes light and power to the people of Plentywood. In November, 1930, it employed the Farmers’ & Merchants’ State Bank to collect its monthly bills and instructed the cashier of the bank to keep a record of daily collections made on blank “collection statements” furnished, to which the “stubs” from customers’ bills should be attached as the bills were paid, and directed that each third day the collection statement should be mailed to the plaintiff’s office at WiHiston, North Dakota, with a draft for the full amount collected during the period. The plaintiff was not a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Commercial Bank of Pa. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Continental National Bank v. WeemsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Washington Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. DukeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Hecker-Jones-Jewell Milling Co. v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- American Can Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Conley v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Miller v. WalterMontana Supreme Court · 1974
- First National Bank v. HenningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Burdick v. SchmittNevada Supreme Court · 1935
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.