Legal Opinion

ConSeal International Incorporated v. Neogen Corporation

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 29, 2020No. 0:19-cv-61242Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 19-cv-61242-BLOOM/Valle CONSEAL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. NEOGEN CORPORATION, Defendant. ________________________________/ OMNIBUS ORDER ON DAUBERT MOTIONS THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff ConSeal International Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Exclude the Expert Reports and Testimony of Defendant’s Expert, Philip J. Shechter, ECF No. [74] (“Plaintiff’s Motion”), and Defendant Neogen Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Opinion and Certain Lost Profits Evidence, ECF Nos. [66]…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API