Bigelow v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan
In Equity. On application for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, District Judge.
The complainant is a citizen of Massachusetts. The defendants, hereafter called, respectively, the Calumet & Hecla Company and the Osceola Company, are corporations organized under the Michigan mining law, and engaged in the manufacture and sale of copper. The complainant, who is the president of, and a substantial stockholder in, the Osceola Company, filed his bill on the 12th day of March, 1907, for the purpose of obtaining injunction, both temporary and permanent, restraining the Calument & Hecla Company from voting at the annual stockholders’ 'meeting of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. E. C. Knight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Richardson v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hyams v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Mannington v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1910
- United States Telephone Co. v. Central Union Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Bigelow v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Union Pac. R. v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.