Legal Opinion
Bangor & Aroostook Railroad v. Bangor Punta Operations, Inc.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided December 29, 1972No. Civ. 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE COURT
GIGNOUX, District Judge.
This action arises under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Clayton Antitrust Act, the Maine Public Utilities Act, and the common law of Maine. Plaintiff Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company (BAR) is a Maine corporation which operates a railroad in the northern part of the State of Maine. Plaintiff Bangor Investment Company (BIC), a Maine corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAR, Defendant Bangor Punta Corporation (Bangor Punta), a Delaware corporation, is a diversified holding company with operating units in various…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Royal Air Properties, Inc., a Corporation, Harold L. Heathman and Madge I. Heathman v. R. Philip SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Gallup v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Babcock v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Columbia Nitrogen Corporation v. Royster CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bangor Punta Operations, Inc. v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Union Electric Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Rea Express, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- In Re REA Express, Inc., Private Treble Damage, Etc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Eastwood v. National Bank of Commerce, Altus, Okl.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.