National Union Electric Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD R. BECKER, District Judge.
I. Preliminary Statement
This opinion addresses yet another motion for summary judgment interposed by defendants in this massive antitrust case. The present motion raises the question whether plaintiff, National Union Electric Corporation (NUE) has standing to maintain the action. While, because of the prominence of co-plaintiff Zenith Radio Corporation in the American television market, the case is often referred to as “the Zenith case,” Zenith did not enter the litigation until 1974. Rather, suit was first instituted by NUE, on December 21, 1970. 1 In its…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Meyers v. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.