Townsend v. Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appel-lee, Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall (“DMJM”), appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, Daniel Townsend (“Townsend”), on a breach of contract claim. DMJM argues that the district court erred in denying: (1) DMJM’s motion for judgment as a matter of law based upon insufficient evidence of contract formation between DMJM and Townsend; and (2) DMJM’s motion for remittitur. Townsend cross-appeals, contending that the trial court erred when it (1) denied front pay damages and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Greene v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Fariss v. Lynchburg FoundryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Wolfgang v. Mid-America Motorsports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- I.M.A., Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Heno v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Finnie v. Jefferson County School District R-1Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Greene v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Questar Pipeline Co. v. GrynbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Scoular Co. v. DenneyColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.