State v. Danny Robert Alexander
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.
¶ 42. (concurring). Compelled statements by the defendant to his extended supervision agent were erroneously appended to the presentence investigation report (PSI) in the instant case. The defendant moved for resentencing, arguing that the circuit court improperly considered these statements when imposing sentence, violating the defendant's privilege against self-incrimination.
¶ 43. The circuit court denied the defendant's motion. The court of appeals granted the defendant resentencing based on ineffective assistance of counsel, an issue it raised sua sponte.
¶ 44. I agree with the majority…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Bartholomew v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund & Compcare Health Services InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Maurin v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Bartus v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.