Legal Opinion

Arnerich v. Almaden Vineyards Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1942No. Civ. 12013PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict that it take nothing for severance damages alleged to have been caused to defendant’s main lands by plaintiff condemning an easement for underground pipe lines across the extreme northwest corner of defendant’s lands. The judgment appealed from was rendered on a trial of a portion of this proceeding. The first trial in a determination that plaintiff had the legal right to condemn the easement, and in a verdict for defendant of $10 for the actual land taken for the easement, and $2,500 severance damages. A new trial was granted solely…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Coast Counties Gas & Electric Co. v. Miller & Lux Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District Ex Rel. State Reclamation Board v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. City of Menlo Park v. ArtinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. City of Los Angeles v. GeigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. City of Oakland v. NutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API