Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Armstrong Rubber Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided April 23, 1999No. Civ.A. 3:92CV371BNPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Pirelli Tire LLC (“Pi-relli”), the successor by merger to The Armstrong Rubber Company (“Armstrong”). Having considered the Motion,. Response, Rebuttal, supporting and opposing authority, and all attachments to each, the Court finds the motion is denied in part and granted in part.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
This case involves claims of ground and air contamination (“air particulate contamination”) of properties in and around a tire plant which…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kennett-Murray Corporation v. John E. BoneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Lillian Washington, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Arsane Washington v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- National Screen Service Corporation v. The Poster Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frazier v. East Tennessee Baptist Hospital, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Metropolitan Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2007
- In Re Enron Corporation SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Curry v. TurnerMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Newby v. Enron Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.