Legal Opinion

Blakeley v. Kanaman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1915No. 2714PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, First District, in an appeal from Harris County. Blakeley sued Kanaman and wife, and procured writ of error on the affirmance, on his appeal, of a judgment of the trial court denying him recovery.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

Clara Kanaman, joined by her husband, W. I. Kanaman, entered into a contract of agency and sale with William H. Olschewske, duly acknowledged, empowering the latter as their agent to negotiate and contract for the sale and exchange of certain real estate, the separate property of Mrs. Kanaman, situated in the city of Houston, upon terms stipulated in the contract, and binding the Kanamans to convey the property accordingly. Olschewske negotiated a sale and exchange of the property, upon the terms of the contract, with the plaintiff in error, and as the agent of the Kanamans entered into a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ballard v. CarmichaelTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. City of San Antonio v. GrandjeanTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Kellett v. TriceTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Wadkins v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Wright v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Click v. SealeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Blue v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Hays v. MarbleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Crabb v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Pickens v. BacleTexas Supreme Court · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API