Legal Opinion

General Motors Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency and Carol M. Browner, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 23, 1999No. 98-1027PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.

GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:

The Environmental Protection Agency determined that General Motors violated a Clean Water Act permit issued by the State of Michigan, for which the agency imposed an administrative penalty of $62,500. GM. petitions for review, arguing primarily that the EPA erred in refusing to consider the Company’s collateral attack upon the validity of the state-issued permit. We conclude, first, that the EPA reasonably interpreted the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1311 et seq., to preclude such a collateral attack in the course…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  2. BP Exploration & Oil, Inc. v. U.S. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
  3. Psa v. Port of TacomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. In Re Spa at Sunset Isles Condominimum Ass'n, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2011
  5. United States v. Gulf States Steel, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API