King v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Partlow
Harry P. King began suit in the city court of Kewanee against appellant, Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, to recover for personal injuries. Appellees, Joseph D. Ryan and Philip Rosenthal, were attorneys for King, and a verdict was returned against appellant. Later the case was settled by King without the knowledge of his attorneys and they filed an intervening petition for an attorney’s lien under the statute. There was a judgment against appellant and this appeal followed.
It is contended by appellant that appellees were not entitled to a hen for the reason that they, through…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ingersoll v. Coal Creek Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Proctor v. TowsIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Mullanphy Savings Bank v. SchottIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Rawson v. CurtissIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
- People ex rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. BerezniakIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kapelski v. Alton & Southern RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Mudd v. Goldblatt Bros., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Holbeck v. Illinois Bankers Life Assurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Field v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1952
- Dodson v. Loaleen Mutual Benefit Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.