Legal Opinion

Field v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 13, 1952No. 48 C 1078PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LA BUY, District Judge.

The above cause was brought pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act to. recover for damages to plaintiff’s automobile as a result of the alleged negligence of an employee of the United States. The government answered denying the allegations of the complaint and specifically denying the employee was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident. Subsequently, the government moved for a summary judgment submitting an affidavit of said employee wherein he averred he had gone off on a frolic and detour of his own at the time the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rufino v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Curtis v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1953
  3. Baker v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958
  4. Mandelbaum v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1955
  5. Baker v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API