Legal Opinion

Mudd v. Goldblatt Bros., Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 21, 1983No. 81-2779PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Plaintiff Duncan Mudd brought this action to recover damages for injuries he suffered due to the alleged negligence of defendants, Boy Carriers, Inc., First Baptist Church of Hammond, Indiana, Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company and Terry Frankovich. An amended complaint included Goldblatt Bros., Inc., the parent company of Boy Carriers, Inc., as a defendant. The Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company was dismissed upon motion and is no longer involved. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of defendant First Baptist Church of Hammond at the end of plaintiff’s case. The jury returned…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bruske v. ArnoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. The People v. SaikenIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  5. City of Evanston v. PiotrowiczIllinois Supreme Court · 1960

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tierney v. Community Memorial General HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  2. Lundquist v. NickelsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Rush v. HamdyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Illinois Armored Car Corp. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. LaPook v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API